3 ms·
What you've worked on sounds much more scientific than OP.
by Hydraulix989 11y ago
What you've worked on sounds much more scientific than OP.
- OJFord 11y agoI'm not sure if that's fair. They (claim to) have [0] a bunch of PhDs, and have a page with the same kind of words on [1] as parent. [0] https://www.brain.fm/about [1] https://www.brain.fm/#science
- Hydraulix989 11y ago#credentials
- merkahbah 11y agoTheir man researcher has a PhD in Neuroscience and the lead guy has been researching and developing audio-neuro software for over 11 years. https://www.transparentcorp.com/company/staff_details.php https://www.transparentcorp.com/company/staff_details.php
- OJFord 11y agoWell, yes?! Your implied complaint was that their work is not very scientific. The team having PhDs in neuroscience is irrelevant/unsatisfactory/bad? What would you like to see? Would it have seemed more scientific to you if they'd done it at a hackathon?
- Hydraulix989 11y agoObviously irrelevant, which renders moot the other two questions that you asked me. My point is that the work itself is what makes something scientific, not the workers' CVs (note the careful wording here; calling them researchers is another appeal to credentialism). With that in mind, what would I like to see? You should be able to answer that one yourself now.