3 ms·
Hello world. I have a different gripe with Wikipedia that has nothing to do with whether articles within it are factual or not: poor writing style. Wikipedia
by greendestiny_re 11y ago
Hello world.
I have a different gripe with Wikipedia that has nothing to do with whether articles within it are factual or not: poor writing style.
Wikipedia editor guidelines encourage cooperation and consensus, but this regularly results in edit wars, where editors aggressively delete each other's edits. To resolve this, editors will usually resort to an unspoken system in which one editor will write one fragment of a sentence and cite sources for that fragment, the other editor writes the next fragment and cites it and so on. The result is a horrible mess that, although most likely entirely factual, is perfectly unreadable.
Worse yet, it is very difficult to simply copy such a paragraph from Wikipedia and paste it to your friend's chat box - the inline citation marks remain as full blown numbers and have to be removed by hand.
- vilhelm_s 11y agoI don't think the fact that citations occur inside sentences is necessarily because the articles are collaboratively edited. Scientific articles generally do the same thing, even if they are just written by one person, in order to make it clear which part of the sentence the citation refers to.
- soared 11y agoCan you point me to a good example of this? I've never noticed wikipedia to be unreadable.
- kuschku 11y agoIf you don't speak high-school level English (C1), then maybe just use simple.wikipedia.org? That page focuses on articles with simpler grammar, easily understandable for children or people who learn English as second language.