The suit seems to be over the use of the "Archery Tag" trademark in advertising? That seems perfectly legal (article states it as well). Typical "we'll suebully

The suit seems to be over the use of the "Archery Tag" trademark in advertising? That seems perfectly legal (article states it as well). Typical "we'll suebully you" case imo. So how do you get these patents voided if there's clear evidence another company (the arrows he sells from Germany) produced something similar before? Pretty clear case of priors at least according to European patent law which is the only one I'm vaguely familiar with. I think that would be awesome. You bully you pay a hefty price.