4 ms·
Now this is an example of a company that really doesn't understand the term "Streisand Effect"....
by nicolas_t 11y ago
Now this is an example of a company that really doesn't understand the term "Streisand Effect"....
- chris_wot 11y agoIt's also a company that has hired a lawyer who doesn't know how to spell. Apparently the interference is "long and twisted", or tortuous: "As a result of Larping’s tortuous interference with Global’s contractual relationships, Global respectfully requests this Court to enter judgment against Larping in such an amount to be proven at trial, together with punitive damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest at the highest legal rate, the costs of this action, and all other relief as this Court deems just and proper."
- donatzm 11y agohttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tortious_interference https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tortious_interference
- chris_wot 11y agoYup. Notice that "i" in tortious? You haven't linked to: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tortous_interference https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tortous_interference
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- khedoros 11y agoAlso, "later" instead of "latter" in their press release.
- vic-traill 11y agoDoesn't seem that out of line to me according to [0]. Subsituting from definitions in [0] yields 'as a result of Larping's deceitfully indirect or morally crooked interference' || 'as a result of Larping's circuitous interference', etc. [0] http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/tortuous http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/tortuous
- chris_wot 11y agoA tort is a specific legal term. Tortious interference is a specific phrase used throughout the filing, and it has a very specific and well defined meaning in civil suits. This filing is a badly written, flawed and absurd lawsuit and it's bound for failure. I hope the defendant applies for and is awarded damages.