"The right perspective, I would argue, is to embrace the benefits of technology and seek out new evaluation models that emphasize open, collaborative review by

"The right perspective, I would argue, is to embrace the benefits of technology and seek out new evaluation models that emphasize open, collaborative review by the community as a whole instead of closed pro forma review by two or three semi-randomly selected experts." Can't agree more with that. The problem is that it's hard to change the system that has already been built around gaming this status quo. Maybe some sort of blockchain for publications & peer reviews that could decentralize and break with current world ruled by few publishers? Anyway I have a feeling that any system here could be gamed too...