39 ms·
You're both partially right, the numbers from the Time article appear to be off, but other sources still indicate that the difference in revenue per employee is
by ZenoArrow 11y ago
You're both partially right, the numbers from the Time article appear to be off, but other sources still indicate that the difference in revenue per employee is greater than x1.2.
Here's a simple but imperfect comparison, let's look at Amazon 2014 vs Walmart 2015 (I'm using those years because they were the easiest stats to find, if you can source similar stats for Amazon 2015 or Walmart 2014 feel free to link to them)...
Amazon 2014:
http://www.statista.com/statistics/234488/number-of-amazon-employees/ http://www.statista.com/statistics/234488/number-of-amazon-e...
Revenue: $89 billion.
Number of employees: 154,100.
Revenue per employee: $577,547.
Walmart 2015:
http://corporate.walmart.com/_news_/walmart-facts/corporate-financial-fact-sheet http://corporate.walmart.com/_news_/walmart-facts/corporate-...
Revenue: $482.2 billion (not clear if just in US or globally).
Number of employees: 1.4 million US (2.2 million globally).
Revenue per employee: $344,428 if revenue is US only, $219,182 if revenue is worldwide.
Difference in revenue per employee:
X1.68 (if Walmart revenue is US only), or x2.68 (if Walmart revenue is worldwide).
- Animats 11y agoIs this counting Amazon's various computer services? Those are profitable but not labor-intensive.