> Small note - in the case of this particular phone it doesn’t have a secure enclave. Correct. Should have said this explicitly. They could use the precedent o

> Small note - in the case of this particular phone it doesn’t have a secure enclave. Correct. Should have said this explicitly. They could use the precedent of bypass functionality in this instance to have it ship with new phones bypassing SE. I think the enclave is probably an enclave, but if it is secure they are going to want access to it. Picking a 5c in this instance and getting the Supreme Court to grant this would be a good way to make a defacto law that applies to a markedly different set of technology sets.