3 ms·
"Programs such as this one do not, at least in my humble opinion, threaten the legal profession writ large" Is there someone who has opposite opinion? Where can
by meshr 11y ago
"Programs such as this one do not, at least in my humble opinion, threaten the legal profession writ large"
Is there someone who has opposite opinion? Where can I read about it? I believe that in ideal world programs should make court decisions and people (like coders) should just translate real cases to universal legal language so that court-bot can make decision.
- newman314 11y agoIdeally, yes. However , I don't think you can code something to solve the trolley problem. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trolley_problem https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trolley_problem
- meshr 11y agoThanks for the link. Here is good article about it http://www.nature.com/news/machine-ethics-the-robot-s-dilemma-1.17881 http://www.nature.com/news/machine-ethics-the-robot-s-dilemm... IMHO, trolley problem is too theoretical. Firstly, these binary events are far from reality based on probabilities and context (like why could this situation occur?). Secondly, the answers to those questions highly depend on the society laws. These problems are missing crucial information what punishment should you expect in both cases. If you don’t know anything how the society will treat these cases then you shouldn’t do anything (for ex., Is it allowed to act like a policeman in this society?) Thirdly it depends whether you are a donor or donee in this society (can you compensate consequences of the damage of your actions?). I found the titles that I was looking for:Universal moral grammar: theory, evidence and the future;Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong