> You're either fully behind him or your completely against him. Any time you see a highly polarized issue, I'd recommend asking yourself why there's no middle

> You're either fully behind him or your completely against him. Any time you see a highly polarized issue, I'd recommend asking yourself why there's no middle ground. Easy enough. Some people take principled stands on issues, even when it's not always politically convenient. If you disagree with them, you are wrong, even if you are well-meaning. Even their political enemies can be seen giving them respect - Scalia and Ginsburg were good friends! Some people take populist stands on issues, appeal to one group by attacking another - the Establishment Candidates in Washington, the 1%, immigrants, whoever. If you disagree with them, you are stupid or a bad person. "Neutral ground" is enemy territory.