5 ms·
It took me four months to get through that thing, what with its weird random digressions. One chapter would be talking about the Knights Templar building treasu
by johnhattan 11y ago
It took me four months to get through that thing, what with its weird random digressions. One chapter would be talking about the Knights Templar building treasure-tunnels under France, and suddenly the next chapter would open with a paragraph explaining why a woman's physiology is better suited for playing pinball than a man's.
A compelling read, but I was never quite sure what facts would end up being important to the plot.
(FWIW, the pinball fact was not)
- coldtea 11y ago>A compelling read, but I was never quite sure what facts would end up being important to the plot. The plot is seldom the main point in literature, especially good literature -- it's mostly a vehicle to convey thoughts and observations about life, the universe and everything as opposed to the end goal (as in a (common) detective story or a pulp thriller).
- coliveira 11y agoI wish writers (and readers) really understood that. It is so boring to open a book that reads just like a Hollywood movie script and has no depth to justify reading.
- fenomas 11y agoWell, yeah. Foucault's Pendulum is to me what Finnegan's Wake is apparently to many others - certainly not a casual read; more something to pick apart slowly and ponder the subtle mysteries of. But even underneath all the digressions and metaphysics, I still find the core story enjoyable as well. Plus it's as brilliant a takedown of conspiracy-theory-thinking as ever the world will see.
- pmoriarty 11y ago"Plus it's as brilliant a takedown of conspiracy-theory-thinking as ever the world will see." How does it compare on that score to The Illuminatus Trilogy[1], written more than a decade before Eco's book? [1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illuminatus https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illuminatus
- mcguire 11y agoThe Illuminatus Trilogy is a couple of guys getting stoned and screwing around with various goofy ideas. Like a lot of postmodern stuff, it doesn't take much of anything, especially its subject seriously. Foucault's Pendulum is a very smart guy who knows a lot, pointing out that, if you peel an onion you won't find anything in the center.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- toupeira 11y agoIlluminatus! is a work of satire, so it not taking itself seriously is part of the point. If you want to really get something out of it you have look beyond the psychedelic sillyness, and read up one some of the countless philosophical/occult concepts and historical oddities referenced in the story.
- anigbrowl 11y agoI think there's rather more to the Illuminatus trilogy than that. And I say that as big fan of Eco who has enjoyed his deeply obscure stuff as well as his more well-known works.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- trevelyan 11y agoConspiracy thinking is a cancer: it will destroy you.
- whiddershins 11y agoIt's perfect to read them one right after the other.
- rjsw 11y agoAnother layer to the book is that there were plenty of real conspiracies in Italian politics during the period in which it is set. It was published at around the time that information on Gladio [1] became public. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Gladio https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Gladio
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]