Well the DOJ doesn't get to unilaterally decide what is the greater good, let alone how to get there. There's multiple civil processes to go through to hopefull

Well the DOJ doesn't get to unilaterally decide what is the greater good, let alone how to get there. There's multiple civil processes to go through to hopefully interweave the legal, political, judicial, ethical, and technical issues. It should be a battle. A vigorous debate exposes the weak arguments and we ought to end up with the best ones, assuming the predominate state of society is stable. My complaint about DOJ is trying to inject emotional catchphrases, and classic propaganda techniques, to distort a rational process. It makes their position look weak out of the gate.