3 ms·
In my opinion the WSJ has a major rendering bug that affects everyone except for the google search crawler, and I selectively set my User Agent to get around sa
by lojack 11y ago
In my opinion the WSJ has a major rendering bug that affects everyone except for the google search crawler, and I selectively set my User Agent to get around said bug.
- comex 11y agoIn any judge's opinion, you'd be full of shit. Judges aren't stupid. Which doesn't matter, because the WSJ is never going to sue you. But make sure you only consider your justification a personal one, not one that would provide any legal protection.
- djsumdog 11y agoMost judges and legislators are fucking morons. Legal systems aren't a science. I wrote a thing on it a few years ago: http://khanism.org/security/legality/ http://khanism.org/security/legality/
- newjersey 11y agoI thought the problem was that it doesn't matter if WSJ is malicious in this case. Because cfaa is a criminal matter, zealous police departments and district attorney's offices can pursue heavy handed cases even without much cooperation from "the victim" which in this case is a corporation. All I want to say is scrape cfaa now!
- bigjust 11y ago> scrape cfaa now! pun?