3 ms·
So? Is this a "two wrongs make a right?" More importantly, is violating "Google's rules" suddenly a violation of law?
by mod 11y ago
So? Is this a "two wrongs make a right?"
More importantly, is violating "Google's rules" suddenly a violation of law?
- ikeboy 11y agoThis would never go to court, but if it did, I could see a jury being sympathetic. You could sort of argue that WSJ had an obligation to Google to allow referred users to view the pages, and that Google passed that right onto the user, so you were contractually authorized to access it. IANAL and this is most likely wrong, but kind of plausible to my NAL mind.
- RubyPinch 11y agoI don't think its wrong to browse a site's content that they have advertised as publically available? If they are advertising incorrectly, they should fix that.
- redukt 11y agoFalse advertising is also illegal