4 ms·

The examples you cite are not comparable to the caste system. The caste system explicitly implies inherent inferiority/superiority in one human being over anoth

• yumraj 17y ago
  - I think you should ask Evangelical Christians if they consider other humans inferior otherwise why else do they try to "save" them from their inferiority. - You should ask KKK/Neo Nazis if they consider Blacks inferior or superior? - You should ask Chinese if they consider the mixed race Black singer (from the Chinese version of American Idol) inferior? - Some Muslims consider non-muslims Kafir. - Shia and Sunni consider each other inferior. - Some muslim sects in Pakistan, and elsewhere, are considered non-muslims. - Jews consider Palestinians, and vice versa, inferior. And so on and so forth... So, yes, those examples do apply.
  • jimmyjim 17y ago
    I should still point out that in some of your examples, there is a choice. E.g., if a Muslim really holds a non-Muslim to be 'inferior', he'll no longer be inferior if he converts. It seems that there's no such hope or opportunity in the caste system.
    • indigoviolet 17y ago
      To me, that's just splitting hairs. I don't consider religious discrimination to be any better than caste-based or skin-color-based discrimination. My point is that this is one more manifestation of an inherent feature of human behavior, to consider similar people to be better than dissimilar people. Societies that become prosperous and educated can counteract this urge to some extent, but I haven't seen any society that really stamps it out.