3 ms·
>Submitters without any network at all are screwed. If success in becoming featured on Product Hunt is contingent on the submitter's network, then the submitte
by rl3 11y ago
>Submitters without any network at all are screwed.
If success in becoming featured on Product Hunt is contingent on the submitter's network, then the submitter's product is probably of such quality that they're screwed anyways.
That, or their product is solid but it simply isn't appealing to the PH crowd. You see cool stuff every day that fits that description, usually accumulating a mere handful of votes. Generally speaking, the more niche the product is, the more likely it is to end up in that category.
Product Hunt is ruthless curation. It isn't designed to be fair. Suffice it to say, exceptional products—or products that make waves elsewhere—are almost assuredly bound to do well on Product Hunt, regardless if the author even has an account there, let alone a network.
To be clear, I'm not defending insider voting rings, I'm just saying the best strategy is to trancend them entirely.
- AndrewKemendo 11y agoThe difference is where the product shows up on the PH page. With a network, you automatically get access to the front page. Without it, you won't even show up on the site even if it's the best product in the world for the PH crowd.
- rl3 11y agoIt'd still be posted on Product Hunt though, despite no self-submission. That said, banking on PH to carry your initial launch is a bad idea if you've no network there, let alone posting ability.