Your tone is needlessly aggressive and your post has little to do with either the post or the comment you're replying to. We got it, you don't like the way IPyt

Your tone is needlessly aggressive and your post has little to do with either the post or the comment you're replying to. We got it, you don't like the way IPython is designed - is that it? If so, why write so many words about it? Or do you propose that the implementation in the article is superior to IPython?