3 ms·
"Apple is a very rich company" I'm sorry, but this strikes me as wrong, if they were not rich, would they not be compelled todo this, or would they not be able
by marak830 11y ago
"Apple is a very rich company"
I'm sorry, but this strikes me as wrong, if they were not rich, would they not be compelled todo this, or would they not be able to argue against it as visibly? (I personally think the second would be more likely).
Civic responsibility? What is next? Agreeing to some idiots religious views and blocking anyone from seeing nudity?
I am sorry, but they are a company, not an elected group. If they are not breaking a law, well you can take those arguments of civic responsibilities and shout them at a tree for all that it matters.
I am trying to resist the urge to bring up some hyperbolic argument against this, purely as i am so shocked someone on hn would try an argument this rediculous.
Its akin so 'someone think of the children', in my mind, and as baseless as that sort of argument.
- tptacek 11y agoThat particular logic is not wrong; relative hardship is something courts routinely take into consideration.