3 ms·
This is a court case. What is under this discussion is not what is reasonable, but what is the law and how it applies to this case. That seems to come down to w
by iofj 11y ago
This is a court case. What is under this discussion is not what is reasonable, but what is the law and how it applies to this case. That seems to come down to whether or not is is considered an "undue burden" on Apple to break security on this device, and that's it.
If you want the law to change, I would hope that the court sides with the FBI, as that will provide far more ammunition to anyone wanting to change the law than ruling in favor of Apple.
- wfo 11y agoThis is a discussion. Most of the people here are not lawyers. In discussions we generally discuss right and wrong and what is reasonable, which have nothing to do with the law. The law is an ancillary technical concern about what the FBI or Apple will be forced/allowed to do, and has nothing to do with what they should do.
- narrowrail 11y agoThe only law I've seen proposed would force Apple to comply with the FBI request. Given that, perhaps the law doesn't currently mandate what you think it does?