3 ms·
That's not a solution at all. That might stop just seriously stem corporate money into research. It seems like to me a better solution would be a "reverse copyr
by personjerry 11y ago
That's not a solution at all. That might stop just seriously stem corporate money into research. It seems like to me a better solution would be a "reverse copyright" of sorts, where the results of any study MUST be published after X amount of years.
- danieltillett 11y agoThe studies are already supposed to be published - the problem is that there has been no enforcement. Until there is some real penalty for not publishing then nothing will change. Having said this if the publication(s) are not well done then this can be almost as bad as not publishing. No data is often better than bad data.