4 ms·
...and that obligates Apple to help them — at the peril of their customers' trust — how, again?
by rosser 11y ago
...and that obligates Apple to help them — at the peril of their customers' trust — how, again?
- mc32 11y agoBy way of a lawful court order? Customers would lose trust if Apple were negligent about their users' security but here there is no negligence. It's a court order, which Apple can contest and have and we'll see who prevails in the courts. This isn't a rogue agent knocking at the door and ransacking things.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]