3 ms·
Yep. But this safe-maker promised people a safe so strong that the maker himself can't break in. The government's request and their response has proven that fa
by marcoperaza 11y ago
Yep. But this safe-maker promised people a safe so strong that the maker himself can't break in. The government's request and their response has proven that false, at least for older iSafe units with the default combination length (4 digits). This line from their press release makes me suspect that even newer iSafes are not safe from this safe-maker:
> In the wrong hands, this software — which does not exist today — would have the potential to unlock any iPhone in someone’s physical possession.
- simoncion 11y ago> This line from their press release makes me suspect that even newer iSafes are not safe from this safe-maker: Please see this comment for discussion about that line of reasoning: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11131777 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11131777 I'm not saying that your intuition here is wrong, but rather that Cook's statement has some subtle nuances to it that some seem to miss.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]