3 ms·
Precedents are a cop out for critical thinking. Sure, they seem to have their uses, like when it guarantees victory for the righteous. However, it seems more li
by suneilp 11y ago
Precedents are a cop out for critical thinking. Sure, they seem to have their uses, like when it guarantees victory for the righteous. However, it seems more likely it's being used as a 'they did it, so can we!' excuse.
It's one thing if you use it as a starting point for discourse, it's another when you use it to beat down the opposition with what amounts to childish antics dressed up in a suit and tie.
- throwaway2048 11y agoPrecedent is an actual legal term of art, where a case decision can lead to binding (in the hard sense) judgements in proceeding cases.