3 ms·
If it uses Falcon under the hood, why not just use Falcon?
by ipsum2 11y ago
If it uses Falcon under the hood, why not just use Falcon?
- ralmidani 11y agoComputers use binary under the hood, but we layer abstractions on top of that to make programming easier and more productive.
- timothycrosley 11y agoIt has a way simpler programming interface then Falcon while retaining the speed benefits: and is really a way more powerful concept as explained here: https://github.com/timothycrosley/hug/blob/develop/ARCHITECTURE.md#the-guiding-thought-behind-the-architecture https://github.com/timothycrosley/hug/blob/develop/ARCHITECT... The real question should be, why take the time to write Falcon when you can get the same performance and more code-reuse using hug?
- mixmastamyk 11y agoPerhaps they will like your simplifications, and could merge them.
- timothycrosley 11y agoThey really aren't compatible concepts. It's sort of like the difference between werkzeug and Flask, those projects wouldn't and shouldn't ever be merged. Falcon is like a much faster werkzeug with a great maintainer, we've discussed the projects together and both agree that they both should remain separate and both are mutually beneficial.