4 ms·
I think it's amusing that your backend is still human, because really you're just shifting the task onto others, not necessarily solving it. We've "solved it"
by dluan 11y ago
I think it's amusing that your backend is still human, because really you're just shifting the task onto others, not necessarily solving it.
We've "solved it" per se on Experiment by getting good at training other scientists to get good at this. Unfortunately, that's also still pretty technically hard, but we've developed some editorial heuristics.
Like a real NLP + UpGoerFive approach would be awesome and a real value to the science community, but probably very difficult. :)
- ska 11y ago"but probably very difficult." Unless I've really missed something, "probably" here means with near certainty enough beyond our current technical capabilities that predicting a timeline is folly.
- nl 11y agoIt's getting closer Data61 (ex-NICTA) in Australia have a mostly-working thing that parses legislation, compiles it[1] and then checks privacy policies and shows violations[2]. [1] Yes, based on conversations I've had I believe they actually turn it into a byte-code like representation. [2] http://www.csiro.au/en/Research/D61/Areas/Data-for-decisions/Solutions-for-business-management/Regorous http://www.csiro.au/en/Research/D61/Areas/Data-for-decisions...
- kumarski 11y agoIt is not worth the engineering effort at the current moment in time.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]