> It's not as though the AI had a lover who left them and drew inspiration from that experience to become a more effective AI. Well then your ex-lover clearly

> It's not as though the AI had a lover who left them and drew inspiration from that experience to become a more effective AI. Well then your ex-lover clearly deserves co-songwriting credits. As well as their parents. And anybody who has influenced them personally, or even anyone who made the food that they've eaten. There's gotta be a point at which the original is just too far removed from the end result for it to be infringing, otherwise you could just keep going. Also is a model that classifies things isn't the same as those things themselves, or images of those things, and would most I certainly hope it would be considered transformative enough to not be infringing (I am not a lawyer though). I could give it an image of a dog, and it will tell me what it thinks it is. But there doesn't seem to be any way for me to say "show me a dog" and get back any sort of image, infringing or not. Some thought experiments: Let's say you have a copyrighted photo, and I design an API that allows anyone to upload a photo and get a true/false of whether or not it's the same file as your photo. Is this copyright infringement if I never release the original photo?