3 ms·
"However, there is nothing in either license that prevents distributing it in the form of a binary module or in the form of source code." http://zfsonlinux.org
by jamiesonbecker 11y ago
"However, there is nothing in either license that prevents distributing it in the form of a binary module or in the form of source code."
http://zfsonlinux.org/faq.html#WhatAboutTheLicensingIssue http://zfsonlinux.org/faq.html#WhatAboutTheLicensingIssue
Whether any loadable kernel module can be licensed under a different license than the GPL is still up for debate (even Linus says "sometimes"):
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Module-HOWTO/copyright.html http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Module-HOWTO/copyright.html
(Of course, Ubuntu et al have been doing this for years e.g. with Nvidia or HBA binary blob drivers, so it does appear to be a mostly-settled issue..)
- ryao 11y agoThis was settled with the Andrew filesystem, which is a matter that I do not believe Linus considers up for debate. ZFS being a port from another system just like the Andrew filesystem is naturally in the same boat.