4 ms·
If the exam is intended as an assessment of your knowledge, then why should it matter how much time you spent acquiring that knowledge?
by punee 11y ago
If the exam is intended as an assessment of your knowledge, then why should it matter how much time you spent acquiring that knowledge?
- arihant 11y agoIt doesn't matter. The requirements of license seem to be 52 hours of mandatory study/attendance and passing the exam. Zenefits clearly cheated on one of the requirements. the state wants you to make sure you read everything and that you can answer questions about it. It doesn't seem like a stretch at all, especially considering people run their livelihoods based on that license. It's a license to conduct a proper practice and a career.
- punee 11y agoThe point is that those requirements seem redundant.
- arihant 11y ago52 hours of study to start a whole new career do not seem redundant to me. Specially when the field is highly sensitive, legal repercussions are huge, collateral damage arising out of wrong communications can be millions of dollars. Besides, the "redundant" requirements just caught a person trying to cheat -- Zenefits. So you cannot even claim they aren't working.
- yummyfajitas 11y agoThe question we are discussing in this thread is whether or not it's a dumb law. Your comment simply reiterates that the law exists, which no one disputes.