So science is biased? Of course it is, any observer who pays attention for more than a few years knows it is. When you're looking for a specific phenomenon, y

So science is biased? Of course it is, any observer who pays attention for more than a few years knows it is. When you're looking for a specific phenomenon, you're more likely to find supporting evidence. For example, if my hypothesis is that a crow can use a television remote, I'm going to stick a crow in a room with a television remote, and the crow will likely mash enough buttons that I can convince you it's true. And then of course there's statistics, and the famous saying which goes with it. Maybe the real problem is that humans are biased, we're not really looking for the truth, we're looking for confirmation of beliefs we develop for whatever reason. We've always been far better at beating the natural world into submission than observing it anyway...