3 ms·

> So you're in favor then of psychological profiling... Reasonable people are in favor of police and intelligence work that identifies people with both the gen

> So you're in favor then of psychological profiling... Reasonable people are in favor of police and intelligence work that identifies people with both the genuine motive and actual means to seriously endanger the lives and/or property of others and provides reasonable assurance that those people will fail to harm others. This sort of policing is nothing new and has worked spectacularly well for many, many, many decades. So, if that's what you mean by "psychological profiling", then yes. If -however- you're referring to TSA's SPOT teams and similar low-to-no-effort quackery, then no.

ZanyProgrammer 11y ago
You're essentially banning people from flying for possible crimes they might commit.
- simoncion 11y ago
  > You're essentially banning people from flying for possible crimes they might commit. They will be banned from flying because they will be in jail awaiting trial for conspiracy to commit murder, or similar such charges. If someone actually, legitimately poses a serious "danger to aviation", they should be charged, jailed, and stand trial. Do you disagree?