5 ms·
I stopped reading this "treatise" when in the first paragraph Aaron spoke highly of the war criminal Donald Rumsfeld.
by JohnD19 11y ago
I stopped reading this "treatise" when in the first paragraph Aaron spoke highly of the war criminal Donald Rumsfeld.
- terravion 11y agoAaron specifically says you might not want to emulate Donald Rumsfeld. I'm really starting to think that conservatives might have a point that the 21st century left has a problem with name calling and ad hominem to shut down debate. It is possible to think that Donald Rumsfeld should be on trial and still be willing to learn from him.
- deciplex 11y ago> I'm really starting to think that conservatives might have a point that the 21st century left has a problem with name calling and ad hominem to shut down debate. Most of that is movement conservatives complaining that their days of hijacking American culture seem to be in jeopardy (they think - I am not so optimistic).
- JohnD19 11y agoYou might be willing to learn from him if you want to be like him. And expressing how one feels about Rumsfeld because of extensive research done on the "subject", does not in anyway invalidate the purpose of argument. By saying "21st century left, ad hominem, etc,etc" proves you are no more than a provocateur
- S4M 11y agoWell, Hitler was one of the worse individual the world has ever known, but if I had to research on charisma he would be among the people I would study.
- 50CNT 11y agoDid you make that account just to dismiss the entire interview on misinterpreting a minor point and then be inflammatory about it? That makes the provocateur comment of yours a bit ironic doesn't it.