3 ms·

3) SF has spent more than 30k per homeless person per year in the city to do 'something' about it. It's typically unaccounted for money and an area ripe/putrid

by mylons 11y ago

3) SF has spent more than 30k per homeless person per year in the city to do 'something' about it. It's typically unaccounted for money and an area ripe/putrid for corruption.

raddad 11y ago
Maybe put that $30K into a cheap dwelling for said homeless person and problem solved, no longer homeless.
- mylons 11y ago
  don't disagree at all. I admire what salt lake city is doing and think it should be a model for SF