4 ms·
Yep. Or at least say "they charged the analyst with saying something he was himself thinking not true" - if you really don't want to use the quite clear headli
by ptaipale 11y ago
Yep. Or at least say "they charged the analyst with saying something he was himself thinking not true" - if you really don't want to use the quite clear headline that SEC provides: SEC: Deutsche Bank Analyst Issued Stock Rating Inconsistent With Personal View
In colloquial use, we would say the analyst was fired for lying.