5 ms·
GitHub is always going to use the issue template that's on master, not the template from whichever version you happen to have checked out on your machine.
by BHSPitMonkey 11y ago
GitHub is always going to use the issue template that's on master, not the template from whichever version you happen to have checked out on your machine.
- joshmanders 11y agoCurrent file on master to boot. But what makecheck is saying is that only what's in current master matters, not what's in `feature/something-here` or in a commit tree from last year. So shoving it in the repo isn't really a good solution.
- BHSPitMonkey 11y agoIt's the same way with README, CONTRIBUTING, LICENSE, Makefile, package.json, and anything else.
- joshmanders 11y agoNo it's not. I can use the README outside of github as a guide on how to do things with the code. Contributing can define a style guide so we're all on the same page code wise. LICENSE for distribution, Makefile, package.json both are required for the code to work correctly... issue_template.md is only useful in a repo on github.
- steveklabnik 11y agoWith Rust, we already had a mini-template inside of our CONTRIBUTING.md. Doesn't seem very different to me.
- dwightgunning 11y agoHaving the templates in the repo at least gives you a degree of portability. I'm guessing there isn't an "export issues" feature so the above point is moot. I favour the portability.
- jrochkind1 11y agoSure you can export issues from Github, easily. https://api.github.com/repos/rails/rails/issues https://api.github.com/repos/rails/rails/issues