3 ms·
> evidence that would be the result of a search No one is advocating warrantless searches or not requiring reasons for warrants. If I want to get a warrant to
by BWStearns 11y ago
> evidence that would be the result of a search
No one is advocating warrantless searches or not requiring reasons for warrants.
If I want to get a warrant to see who you're calling, it is inherently a broken system that requires the list of people that you called as cause to obtain that warrant.
Any kind of reasoning allows wholesale collection of communications if you misread it properly.
- tremon 11y agoAh, so you do agree with the premise that there must be compelling evidence to warrant a search? In that case, all you(pl.)'re haggling over is the "price point" of how much evidence is required to support how invasive a search. I'm unsure how that results in the kind of heated debate that seems to happen here. Oh well...