I re-read this and I see where I went wrong. I thought I had made a general statement about the cost of memory safety abstractions in programming languages that

I re-read this and I see where I went wrong. I thought I had made a general statement about the cost of memory safety abstractions in programming languages that was misinterpreted as a specific statement about Rust and safety in general. This was because I was not clear in my phrasing. I guess I felt I was being attacked for a point that I wasn't even trying to make. That is, I was responding to you under the impression that I had clearly said something differently than what was interpreted. All without taking the time to read over my own post carefully. Then I got overly emotional which resulted in us talking past each other unproductively and rude remarks on my part. So I'm sorry for being a melodramatic jerk yesterday. I am actively working on my self control and civility, but I definitely made a mistake here. Hope you have a good day.