Hear, hear! I did a whole series of posts analyzing a skeptic's claims: http://matthewmarkus.posterous.com/raw-darwin-airport-temperature-data-with-r http://ma

Hear, hear! I did a whole series of posts analyzing a skeptic's claims: http://matthewmarkus.posterous.com/raw-darwin-airport-temperature-data-with-r http://matthewmarkus.posterous.com/raw-darwin-airport-temper... http://matthewmarkus.posterous.com/darwin-airport-temperature-data-revisited http://matthewmarkus.posterous.com/darwin-airport-temperatur... http://matthewmarkus.posterous.com/darwin-airport-temperature-data-in-context http://matthewmarkus.posterous.com/darwin-airport-temperatur... I found at least one error/discrepancy in each side's output. Of course, neither side released any code. The disclosure of methods is a prerequisite for repeatable experiments, the cornerstone of science.