3 ms·
Easily rectified? The top shareholder/exec got dumped; the entire business is under multiple states' investigations; employees may have purjured themselves at t
by jsprogrammer 11y ago
Easily rectified? The top shareholder/exec got dumped; the entire business is under multiple states' investigations; employees may have purjured themselves at the behest of the business; and clients may have purchased critical business infrastructure from unlicensed agents (which may affect their coverage).
Clearly someone bought in to the pitch, but what strategy would they believe would easily rectify this situation?
- rhino369 11y agoA non start up would pay a law firm to do more investigation and then settle with the government for a pound of flesh but nothing crazy. In the scheme of things skipping a video won't kill a company. But start ups are all about momentum and PR. Plus they'll need money for investigations and settlements. VC capital is expensive.
- seanhunter 11y ago| In the scheme of things skipping a video won't kill a company. Skipping the video is not in itself what could potentially kill the company. However if clients are able to claim that their insurance was mis-sold by Zenefits, it seems to me that could. Mis-selling of payment protection insurance in the UK has already resulted in settlements north of 5 billion GBP, and the issue is not fully resolved yet.