4 ms·
At the very least: the cost of rewriting, re-testing, and re-deploying systems in a memory-safe language. The cost of realizing half-way through adoption that
by JabavuAdams 11y ago
At the very least: the cost of rewriting, re-testing, and re-deploying systems in a memory-safe language.
The cost of realizing half-way through adoption that there are things that you need to do, used to be able to do, but cannot do in the new language.
- pcwalton 11y ago> At the very least: the cost of rewriting, re-testing, and re-deploying systems in a memory-safe language. True. In most cases, this is completely outweighed by the benefit of not having these kinds of security vulnerabilities, as well as the other benefits that come with safety. > The cost of realizing half-way through adoption that there are things that you need to do, used to be able to do, but cannot do in the new language. Can you explain exactly you cannot do with Rust?