9 ms·
My tolerance for lack of configurability correlates inversely with the complexity of the interface. I'd be very annoyed at the behavior of tig, vim, and tmux i
by sevensor 11y ago
My tolerance for lack of configurability correlates inversely with the complexity of the interface. I'd be very annoyed at the behavior of tig, vim, and tmux if I didn't have my .tigrc, .vimrc, and .tmux.conf. Shells have a pretty straightforward interface, so I customize very little other than environment variables and the prompt. My issue with fish then isn't really about its lack of configurability per se, but that by adding a lot of complex behavior to the shell, it's added a lot of stuff I would want to configure.