4 ms·
Yes it is mounting a remote filesystem, it does not have all the same features. I was replying to the title "a FUSE filesystem via HTTP for running software wit
by rgovostes 11y ago
Yes it is mounting a remote filesystem, it does not have all the same features. I was replying to the title "a FUSE filesystem via HTTP for running software without installing it," which the above command permits; the linked page (at least without exploring deeper into the site) doesn't describe dependency resolution. Caching will performed by the kernel, but I don't know how it operates in a multi-user environment.
- rkeene2 11y agoDependency resolution is implicit to the design -- the entire global namespace is available on every system so any dependencies are resolved as they are requested. That is, if you have an executable such as "ls" that relies upon the dynamic linker provided by "glibc", then the glibc requested will be fetched automatically because you attempted to open the dynamic linker. Additionally, the design is superior to the single-user nature of a remote disk image in that each user's writes are redirected to their own home directory (by default, you can change this in a config file). Even further, it allows for setuid files to be handled safely which is sometimes needed (e.g., "sudo" or "chrome-sandbox"). Caching is handled by the kernel for the VFS cache but also by a more persistent disk cache so that you can use applications offline as long as you have cached them (by running them, usually) ahead of time.