3 ms·
I posted exactly this comment and then I noticed yours. Are these camera's actually comparable or is it apples and oranges?
by martijn_himself 11y ago
I posted exactly this comment and then I noticed yours. Are these camera's actually comparable or is it apples and oranges?
- zobby 11y agoFuji xT100 isn't in the same league, as it's a aps-c sensor. Closest competitor would be Sony RX1 ( 24 mpix 35mm FF sensor, fixed lens ) From what i've seen focus peaking, Sony outperforms it in IQ, and even sharpness. RX1 features also more: USB charging, built-in flash, 25% smaller size... You can buy it new for some 2k$ The build quality is outstanding too! ( okay, not leica standards, but close enough ) Sample here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/102221463@N02/10170711924/sizes/o/ https://www.flickr.com/photos/102221463@N02/10170711924/size... compare here http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Leica-Q-Typ-116-versus-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-RX1___1032_833 http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Leica-Q-...
- alistairSH 11y agoYes and no. They are comparable, in that they are both fairly compact, fixed prime lens cameras that offer high quality (camera build and image). They are not comparable,as the Leica has a better/faster autofocus system. In theory it has better optics as well, though I haven't seen a side-by-side. A good friend is a professional photographer. His carry-around fun camera is the X100T. I think his professional-grade stuff is Nikon. I'm sure he'd love the Leica, but it's a lot of money for what is unlikely to be used professionally (at least not by him).