3 ms·

Hi, thank you for the feedback and suggestions. We will make sure to include the pricing in the new homepage we're working on. :) By the way, we're more about

Hi, thank you for the feedback and suggestions. We will make sure to include the pricing in the new homepage we're working on. :) By the way, we're more about quick sharing than syncing. We will be overhauling our homepage to make that clearer. Here's the app if you're using a Mac (Windows app is coming soon): https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/jumpshare/id889922906 https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/jumpshare/id889922906

alphapapa 11y ago
Syncing (and its related attributes of backup and redundancy) are more useful, and Dropbox facilitates both that and sharing. So what's your angle? :)
- nakodari 11y ago
  At it's core, Dropbox is about "syncing". But at Jumpshare, the core is "quick sharing". This makes all the difference. We're able to build our product around the quick sharing aspect, for example, our sharing happens in real-time so you don't have to wait for uploads to finish first. And we offer a slew of built-in tools (capturing screenshots, annotations, recording screencasts, etc) and features to supercharge your sharing. You can learn more from the discussion here: https://www.producthunt.com/tech/jumpshare-for-mac https://www.producthunt.com/tech/jumpshare-for-mac
  - alphapapa 11y ago
    Okay, but what happens when Dropbox makes a minor upgrade to their sharing, making it also "quick" or real-time sharing? Already, when uploading a file to Dropbox, it can be shared and partially downloaded before it's finished uploading. Do that with an image or video that was just recorded, or that is being recorded, and that seems like real-time sharing to me. And doing that with Dropbox means that, after it's been shared, it's also synced, mirrored, and backed up for you. Where does that leave Jumpshare?
    - tacos 11y ago
      > Where does that leave Jumpshare? Promoting six-line pull requests on a fringe news website.

alphapapa 11y ago

Syncing (and its related attributes of backup and redundancy) are more useful, and Dropbox facilitates both that and sharing. So what's your angle? :)

nakodari 11y ago
At it's core, Dropbox is about "syncing". But at Jumpshare, the core is "quick sharing". This makes all the difference. We're able to build our product around the quick sharing aspect, for example, our sharing happens in real-time so you don't have to wait for uploads to finish first. And we offer a slew of built-in tools (capturing screenshots, annotations, recording screencasts, etc) and features to supercharge your sharing. You can learn more from the discussion here: https://www.producthunt.com/tech/jumpshare-for-mac https://www.producthunt.com/tech/jumpshare-for-mac
- alphapapa 11y ago
  Okay, but what happens when Dropbox makes a minor upgrade to their sharing, making it also "quick" or real-time sharing? Already, when uploading a file to Dropbox, it can be shared and partially downloaded before it's finished uploading. Do that with an image or video that was just recorded, or that is being recorded, and that seems like real-time sharing to me. And doing that with Dropbox means that, after it's been shared, it's also synced, mirrored, and backed up for you. Where does that leave Jumpshare?
  - tacos 11y ago
    > Where does that leave Jumpshare? Promoting six-line pull requests on a fringe news website.