3 ms·
I thought the 'agreements' were related to active poaching. I wouldn't bat an eyelid hiring somebody who's already quit or is genuinely on the verge of doing s
by dwightgunning 11y ago
I thought the 'agreements' were related to active poaching.
I wouldn't bat an eyelid hiring somebody who's already quit or is genuinely on the verge of doing so.
- st3v3r 11y agoNope. Someone at Google also was let go because they hired someone from Apple who came of their own volition.
- arebop 11y agoThe agreements were variously related to active recruiting (don't cold-call employees of X), passive recruiting (don't hire employees of X), and active retribution for exploring career options (if you at company Y learn of any employees of X seeking jobs at Y, notify management at X). See http://www.hightechemployeelawsuit.com/case-documents.aspx http://www.hightechemployeelawsuit.com/case-documents.aspx for details about which companies made which commitments.