6 ms·

What about the majority of them that did?

• icebraining 11y ago
  What point are you trying to make? All I said is that Women is a (significantly!) larger group than Mothers, so it's wrong to equate the two. The latter is a subset, and an explanation that only covers them, as valid as it may be, is insufficient to explain something about all women.
  • ryanlol 11y ago
    Yeah, but while doing risk analysis it's definitely a thing worth considering.
    • icebraining 11y ago
      Which wasn't what he was doing.
  • DrScump 11y ago
    <Women is a (significantly!) larger group than Mothers> Sure, because the former is a superset of the latter. If you meant instead that "childless Women is a (significantly!) larger group than Mothers", even that stat defies meaningful comparison by including teenagers, clear down to 15-year-olds. A more relevant comparison for this workplace discussion would be constrained to a post-college-age group (say, ages 21-44).