jesus christ! what are these comments? there is a valid point here. i don't even like how the author writes but the point is this, taken from a response: >> Ima

jesus christ! what are these comments? there is a valid point here. i don't even like how the author writes but the point is this, taken from a response: >> Imagine how many opportunities this firm has walked past because they’re old school. Shouldn’t their LPs be concerned? What do you mean "old school?". I am from the other side of the planet than the US and i am statistically flooded with stories of the problem of under funding women, with discrimination based on sex and with the pregnancy issue as a roadblock to career for women. how can a manager in a VC have an "old school" opinion in 2016? these days you either have one opinion or the other, there is nothing "new school" in realizing that women are less funded because their biologic life is seen as a liability by the males of the species who have all the money. Jesus!! Old school?? Your wife? You are someone who should be smart enough to predict success and you bet other people's money but you know so little about a woman's determination that your best answer is by proxying to your nearest women. This is like me having a billion dollars explaining that i believe rockets are not funded as easily as dating apps because I am old school and i think all physicists are nerdy introverts and they'll never be good at running a business because they rather stay and read science fiction books all day long, and i know that because my physicist cousin who is also a drunk is exactly like that. And quotas? Who is even talking about quotas? Amazing!