3 ms·

i've already ditched EOT and the performance improvement is quite significant

• realityking 11y ago
  I'm a bit surprised. Despite saving a couple of bytes of CSS, where should a performance improvement come from?
  • wprapido 11y ago
    EOT are heavy muthafukkas. also, you save a lot by loading WOFF only, what's pretty obvious
    • chain18 11y ago
      Browsers should load only the WOFF file if it is supported though right? Which means if you link to a EOT on a WOFF supporting browser it shouldn't make a difference?