4 ms·
Third-ed. Contrast way too low. Why not use #000000 for the background color? Everything just looks washed out as it stands and almost has the effect of making
by pazra 11y ago
Third-ed. Contrast way too low. Why not use #000000 for the background color? Everything just looks washed out as it stands and almost has the effect of making everything look disabled.
How about something closer to this? http://i.imgur.com/qQr0xId.png http://i.imgur.com/qQr0xId.png
- sonaal 11y agoOn it :) Contrast has got max feedback - thanks for helping out
- ryanSrich 11y agoYou should never use absolute black. It's a common phrase you'll hear your first day of Color Theory class http://ianstormtaylor.com/design-tip-never-use-black/ http://ianstormtaylor.com/design-tip-never-use-black/
- logicrook 11y agoAs much as this advice is correct for painting, it's incorrect for design. What's wrong with black text? Nothing. Ironically, the site you link as a very thin font with very reduced contrast, so it's barely legible on my screen. The site is less legible than dark topfive and giving advice on design... Form follows function. Barely legible text is very bad design.
- ryanSrich 11y ago> is correct for painting, it's incorrect for design I disagree. It's a fundamental concept of Color Theory, which is a fundamental concept of design. > What's wrong with black text? Nothing. But you shouldn't be using absolute black. I tend favor #24242A. I think it's unfair to call the site I linked to barely legible. The font is perhaps a touch too thin, but it's still very legible. Of course this is all subjective.
- stevenkovar 11y agoIn short: eye strain can happen at both extremes of the spectrum. As such, #111 is more friendly than #000. The same background color is fine with a color like #ADAA9E—brighter version of the current color.