4 ms·
The article more or less makes this precise comparison. "Do everything in Emacs" isn't really so different from "Do everything in the browser." Arguably, mode
by jarcane 11y ago
The article more or less makes this precise comparison.
"Do everything in Emacs" isn't really so different from "Do everything in the browser."
Arguably, modern browsers are more heavyweight and complex at that. They certainly eat a hell of a lot more RAM than my Emacs ever does.
- mundanevoice 11y agoTrue, But they also do much more things than Emacs does.
- tempodox 11y agoIf you really believe that you haven't understood emacs at all.
- jarcane 11y agoIronically, the only thing Emacs can't seem to do these days is be a browser. ;)
- to3m 11y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emacs/W3 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emacs/W3 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eww_%28web_browser%29 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eww_%28web_browser%29 I don't believe there is any Javascript support, though, so you'll be out of luck for many modern pages...
- clocksld 11y agoThe xwidget_mvp branch has been merged into the emacs master branch about a month ago. It allows you to embed GTK widgets INSIDE an emacs buffer, effectively allowing one to create actual GUIs inside of emacs. This also allows you to embed a full webkit-based browser (with javascript support!) right into emacs, and use it like a regular browser. Just clone the emacs repo, build it with gtk3 and xwidget support, and run 'M-x xwidget-webkit-browse-url' to get a full-fledged browser with proper rendering right inside emacs. https://www.emacswiki.org/pics/static/EmacsXembedScreenshot.png https://www.emacswiki.org/pics/static/EmacsXembedScreenshot....
- cema 11y agoWell, emacs certainly can be many things, if not all things. But is it? There is a difference.
- mundanevoice 11y agoPlease make me understand!