2 ms·
On Twitter, someone gave an alternate explanation that I'll pass along without agreeing or disagreeing. They suggested the title was a honeytrap to get Haml hat
by raganwald 17y ago
On Twitter, someone gave an alternate explanation that I'll pass along without agreeing or disagreeing. They suggested the title was a honeytrap to get Haml haters to read the post and then be surreptitiously educated on why that argument against Haml is invalid.
Update... That was Chris' explanation!
- grandalf 17y agoI stand corrected.
- twism 17y agoWell I got caught in that honeytrap, so the title does work.
- chriseppstein 17y agoThat's true, but it's also a play on words. Haml (the syntax) sucks for content. This is a fact. Haml (the project) provides ample facilities for working around the syntactic limitations.