4 ms·
p7zip is not anyone's first guess the first time they see a .7z file. And I don't have to download anything to open a .zip or .tgz. Compressing a directory is
by wmil 11y ago
p7zip is not anyone's first guess the first time they see a .7z file. And I don't have to download anything to open a .zip or .tgz.
Compressing a directory is a solved problem with standard solutions. You really should have a reason to push something like 7zip.
- simoncion 11y ago> p7zip is not anyone's first guess the first time they see a .7z file. If you're running KDE (and I think GNOME), the built-in GUI de-compressors handle 7-zip just fine. > Compressing a directory is a solved problem with standard solutions. shrug 7-Zip compresses at least as well as RAR, and doesn't have a file format that permits feeding executable bytecode to a probably-not-very-well-examined bytecode interpreter. [0] [0] True story! http://blog.cmpxchg8b.com/2012/09/fun-with-constrained-programming.html http://blog.cmpxchg8b.com/2012/09/fun-with-constrained-progr...
- DanBC 11y ago>And I don't have to download anything to open a [...] .tgz. You do on some OSs. http://superuser.com/questions/234649/how-to-extract-a-tar-file-tgz-in-windows http://superuser.com/questions/234649/how-to-extract-a-tar-f...
- pmarreck 11y ago> p7zip is not anyone's first guess the first time they see a .7z file I know, googling "7zip OS X" and seeing that the first link ends up directing you to p7zip, is incredibly hard. > You really should have a reason to push something like 7zip How about, it has the best compression available from an open-source compressor. RAR is not open-source.